28 Nov 2011

AutoWeek — Why Daimler killed Maybach

By: Harald Hamprecht on 11/28/2011

Wilhelm Maybach is turning over in his grave. Daimler CEO Dieter Zetsche has announced that the super-luxury brand that carries the famous inventor/engine designer’s name will be terminated. The death comes at a really odd time. This year, Daimler is celebrating its 125th anniversary and is predicting record profits.

Daimler will write off the billion-plus euros already invested in Maybach since it was created by Zetsche’s predecessor, Jürgen Schrempp, in 2002.

Daimler seems unafraid that this move will reduce the Mercedes-Benz Cars group to just two brands: Mercedes-Benz and Smart.

The Maybach brand only survived nine years and, honestly, it has been a dead man walking for a while. Last year, Maybach sold 157 cars. Meanwhile, BMW’s Rolls-Royce subsidiary boosted sales 171 percent last year to a record 2,711 cars.Daimler did a miserable job exploiting the potential in the super-luxury segment–and now finds itself at risk of never being able to compete in the growing segment. There are more and more millionaires and billionaires who do not want to drive a car that has the same brand on the hood as an A-class or B-class.

Rolls-Royce CEO Torsten Müller-Öetvös recently told me how fast the number of super-rich in the world is expected to grow: “There are currently about 90,000 ultra-high-net-worth individuals, and in 10 years we expect this to grow to 125,000. That fact alone makes me optimistic about our prospects.”

Müller-Öetvös expects up to 10,000 Rolls-Royce sales a year in the long-term future.

Zetsche thinks he can address these ultrarich customers with six variants of the next Mercedes S-class, which will be launched in 2013. In addition to the current coupe, short and long version, internal sources expect a convertible similar to the stunning Ocean Drive concept, a super-long S-class version of about 19.6 feet in length and a super-super–almost 22-foot-long–variant that will get the Pullman name and serve politicians, especially heads of state.

The death of Maybach is bad for Aston Martin as well. The prestigious British brand led by Ulrich Bez was hoping to get an order from Stuttgart to develop some variants of the next-generation Maybach.

Of course, Zetsche’s decision also brings some advantages. Maybach has been a bottomless money pit. In the future, those Maybach euros will be invested in improving the core Mercedes brand.

It is a painful decision but one that Zetsche must have thought needed to be made. Of course, that is no consolation for Wilhelm Maybach, whose huge contributions will no longer be honored by keeping his family name alive on the company’s future products.

Read more: http://www.autoweek.com/article/20111128/FREE/111129936#ixzz1f2M4fCcT

28 Nov 2011

AutoNews — Ford Loses Appeal

Ford loses appeal of $22.7 million judgment in supplier case, Michigan court rules

DETROIT — Software engineering supplier EnGenius Inc. of Livonia, Mich., will keep a $22.7 million judgment against longtime customer Ford Motor Co. after the Michigan Supreme Court last week tossed out the automaker’s appeal.

Starting in the 1990s, EnGenius was part of a team that helped maintain Ford’s end-of-line test system. The company was awarded the money in a January 2009 Wayne County court judgment, upholding a prior arbitration award.

In March, the state’s high court agreed to hear Ford’s appeal. But after reviewing legal briefs, it rescinded that decision and said last week that it was “no longer persuaded that the questions should be reviewed.”
At issue were two contracts between the automaker and EnGenius in 2000 involving comprehensive testing systems for Ford’s assembly plants. One contract was to provide continuing technical support for a testing system that EnGenius had developed for Ford in the 1990s, and the other was for a new system to replace it.

The automaker launched the new system at a plant in Wayne, Mich., in 2001 but held off on final approval of the system and allegedly failed to make payments on it even though EnGenius had spent more than $12 million on project development, according to court records.

The original award called for $14.4 million in damages for breach of contract, $1.2 million for lost profits and $1.9 million for tortious interference or intentional conduct that interferes with business relationships, plus about $5 million in pre-judgment interest.

Read more: http://www.autonews.com/article/20111128/OEM01/111129925

CALL US EMAIL US